Proceso de evaluación

The article sent to Allpanchis must be original and unpublished. While it is in the evaluation or editing process, which may last up to 48 weeks, its author or authors will undertake not to refer it to any other publication. Except for exceptions, the translation of texts that due to their importance and restricted access have not circulated in the Spanish-speaking media can be accepted. The reference to the original publication will be included in a footnote at the beginning of the text.

The evaluation process to determine the publication of contributions is carried out by the Executive Committee for the articles included in the sections: “Presentation”, “Academic articles” and “Notes”. With regard to "Dossier articles", the process is led by the "Coordinator" appointed for said dossier.

In the case of “Academic articles”, the Executive Council is responsible for issuing the acknowledgment of receipt of the manuscript (by contact email), indicating whether it is accepted for evaluation or not. In this sense, the Executive Council may reject the proposal if it does not fit the theme and focus and / or does not meet the minimum academic requirements.

After acceptance, the Editor will evaluate and recommend some first formal and content suggestions. After receiving a new version by the author, the evaluation is carried out using the “pairs” or “double blind” system. Two external expert evaluators will be used. The anonymity of the author and evaluator will be maintained at all times. From time to time, the list of past issue reviewers will be published in the magazine, thereby expressing public appreciation. A recent example of the above in the following link: https://revistas.ucsp.edu.pe/index.php/Allpanchis/article/view/1321, where the name of the evaluators for numbers 85 and 86 are listed.

The opinion of the evaluators, through a formal document (available at: https://revistas.ucsp.edu.pe/index.php/Allpanchis/article/view/1179), will be one of: "Acceptance without changes", "Acceptance with suggestions", "Acceptable with changes" and "Rejected". The author will be informed of the decision and report, with the following views: In the second case, the author may send a new version taking into account the suggestions. In the third scenario, a new version with the suggested changes is required from the author, after which the role of new evaluator will remain in the Editor / Council. The term for the modified version is thirty (30) days from the date of the mail sent.

The Editor / Editorial Board resides the final decision of acceptance of the article, considering the evaluations.

Once the article is approved, the author (s) must sign the authorization form for the publication of their manuscript. Said format may be received from the Executive Council.

In this document, the author will establish in writing (a) that his manuscript is original and unpublished and that it has not been sent to another publication simultaneously; (b) that you assign Allpanchis the rights to reproduce your article in the printed and digital version of the magazine; and (c) that you authorize the inclusion of your email in the respective credits.

Once the article is accepted, the editor may require that, as part of the editing and style correction process, he rectifies some errors, verifies certain data, or clarifies dark areas in the writing. In this case, you will have a maximum period of seven (7) business days to respond to the questions raised and return your corrected writing. In this process, the introduction of substantial changes in the text will not be allowed, but only the correction of errors in the accepted version.

Updated: August 2021 (CZM).