Moderación por el género de los efectos del encuadre visual de mensajes COVID-19 sobre emociones negativas
PDF

Palabras clave

Género
Emociones
Encuadramiento visual positivo y negativo
Mensajes COVID-19
Experimento

Cómo citar

R. León, F., I. Calixto, M., Espinosa, A., & Huapaya, C. (2024). Moderación por el género de los efectos del encuadre visual de mensajes COVID-19 sobre emociones negativas. Revista De Psicología, 13(1), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.36901/psicologia.v13i1.1589

Resumen

Un reciente meta-análisis reveló que mensajes persuasivos enmarcados en ganancias inducen emociones positivas en la audiencia mientras que mensajes encuadrados en pérdidas inducen emociones negativas; más aún, la experiencia de emociones positivas potencia la influencia de los encuadramientos de ganancia mientras que las emociones negativas aumentan los efectos de los enmarques de pérdida. Esto sugiere que los efectos de los encuadres de ganancia versus pérdida en la adherencia del público al mensaje son mediados por emociones. Como se sabe que las mujeres experimentan más emociones negativas que los hombres, en el presente estudio exploratorio nosotros evaluamos sesgos de género en las emociones negativas inducidas por imágenes que acompañaban a textos con recomendaciones nutricionales para prevenir la severidad de los síntomas de COVID-19. Los textos estuvieron encuadrados en no-pérdidas. Usando fotos de un ataúd versus una familia, encontramos una robusta interacción imagen x género entre trabajadores de un hospital en Lima, Perú: mientras que el ataúd tendía a aumentar las emociones negativas de las mujeres, aquellas de los hombres presentaban una tendencia opuesta. Así, concluimos que la intervención de emociones en un mismo proceso de persuasión puede terminar en adherencias diferentes de hombres y mujeres al mensaje y esto debe estudiarse. Los investigadores que ignoren la variable género en el encuadramiento visual de mensajes pueden arribar a conclusiones distorsionadas.

https://doi.org/10.36901/psicologia.v13i1.1589
PDF

Citas

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 8-34.

Borrachero, A. B., Brígido, M., Mellado, L., et al. (2014). Emotions in prospective secondary education teachers when teaching science content, distinguishing by gender. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32, 182-215. https:// doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2014.909800

Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.

Carfora, V., Pastore, M., & Catellani, P. (2021). A cognitive-emotional model to explain message framing effects: Reducing meat consumption. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.583209

CDC COVID Response Team. (2020). Characteristics of health care personnel with COVID-19 — United States. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e6

Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72, 144-168. https://doi. org/10.1080/03637750500111815

Gerend, M. A., & Maner, J. K. (2011). Fear, anger, fruits, and veggies: Interactive effects of emotion and message framing on health behavior. Health Psychology, 30, 420-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021981

Hasseldine, J., & Hite, P. A. (2003). Framing, gender and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 517-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00209-X Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-300.

Hollands, G. J., & Marteau, T. M. (2016). Pairing images of unhealthy and healthy foods with images of negative and positive health consequences: Impact on attitudes and food choice. Health Psychology, 35, 847-851. https://doi.org/10.1037/ hea0000293.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 24, 263-291.

Kim, H.J. (2010). The effects of gender and gain versus loss frame on processing breast cancer screening messages. Communication Research, 39, 385-412. https://doi. org/10.1177/0093650211427557

Kong, G., Cavallo, D. A., Camenga, D. R., et al. (2016). Preference for gain- or loss-framed electronic cigarette prevention messages. Addictive Behavior, 62, 108-113.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.06.015

Kushner, K. (2017). Why is depression more common among women than among men?

The Lancet Psychiatry, 4, 140-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30263-2

Lee, Y-I, Jin, Y., & Nowak, G. (2018). Motivating influenza vaccination among young adults: The effects of public service advertising message framing and text versus image support. Social Marketing Quarterly, 24, 89-103. https://doi. org/10.1177/1524500418771283

León, F. R., Morales, O., Vértiz, H., & Burga-León, A. (2017). Universality of gender differences in 10 aspects of personality: A study of younger and older adult Peruvians. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 112, 124-127. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.060

Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799-823. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-psych-010213-115043

Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 361-67.

Masumoto, K., Shiozaki, M., & Taishi, N. (2019). The impact of age on goal-framing for health messages: The mediating effect of interest in health and emotion regulation PLoS ONE, 15, e0238989. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238989

Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination, intentions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 500-510.

Mikels, J. A., Young, N. A., Liu, X., et al. (2020). Getting to the heart of the matter in later life: The central role of affect in health message framing Gerontologist, 20, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa128

MINSA (2020). Resolución Ministerial N° 233-2020. Ministerio de Salud del Perú, 27 de abril de 2020.

Nabi, R. L., Walter, N., Oshidary, et al., (2020). Can emotions capture the elusive gain-loss framing effect? A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 47, 1107-1110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219861256

Nan, X. (2012) Communicating to young adults about HPV vaccination: Consideration of message framing, motivation, and gender. Health Communication, 27, 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.567447

Nan, X., Daily, K., & Qin, Y. (2018). Relative persuasiveness of gain- vs. loss-framed messages: a review of theoretical perspectives and developing an integrative framework. Review of Communication, 18, 370-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/15 358593.2018.1519845

O’Keefe, D. J., Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A metaanalytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 623-644. https://doi. org/10.1080/10810730701615198

O’Keefe, D. J., Jensen, J. D. (2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59, 296-316. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01417.x

O’Keefe, D. J., & Wu, D. (2012). Gain framed messages do not motivate sun protection: A meta-analytic review of randomized trials comparing gain-framed and loss-framed appeals for promoting skin cancer prevention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9, 2121-2133. https://doi. org/10.3390/ijerph9062121

Ormel, J., Bastiaansen, A., Riese, H., et al. (2013). The biological and psychological basis of neuroticism: Current status and future directions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37, 59-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.09.004

Parsonson, K. L. (2021). The universal declaration of ethical principles for psychologists. In K. L. Parsonson (Ed.), Handbook of International Psychology Ethics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367814250

Perkins, B. A., Satkus, P., & Finney, S. J. (2019) Examining the factor structure and measurement invariance of test emotions across testing platform, gender, and time. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 38, 969-981. https://doi. org/10.1177/0734282920918726

Petzel1, Z. W., & Noel, J. G. (2021). Don’t drink and drive, it’s a prime: Cognitive effects of priming alcohol congruent and incongruent goals among heavy versus light drinkers. Journal of Health Psychology, 26, 2966-2972. https://doi. org/10.1177/1359105320934166

Putrevu, S. (2010). An examination of consumer responses toward attribute- and goal-framed messages. Journal of Advertising, 39, 5-24. https://doi.org/10.2753/ JOA0091-3367390301

Rothman, A.J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3-19.

Seo, K. (2020). Meta-analysis on visual persuasion – Does adding images to texts influence persuasion? Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications, 6, 177-190. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajmmc.6-3-3

Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 324-337.

Shamaskin, A.M., Mikels, J.A., & Reed, A.E. (2010). Getting the message across: Age differences in the positive and negative framing of health care messages. Psychology and Aging, 25, 746-751. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018431

Sontag, J. M. (2019). Visual framing effects on emotions and mental health message effectiveness. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 11, 30-47. https://doi.org/

1080/17538068.2018.1435017

Toll, B. A., Salovey, P., O’Maley, S. S., et al. (2008). Message framing for smoking cessation: The interaction of risk perceptions and gender. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 10, 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200701767803

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458.

Updegraff, J. A., & Rothman, A. J. (2013). Health message framing: Moderators, mediators, and mysteries. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 668-679. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12056

Van Delden, J. J. M., & van der Graff, R. (2016). Revised CIOMS International Ethical Guidelines for health-related research involving humans. Journal of the American

Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.18977

Wadman, M. (2020) Why obesity worsens COVID-19. Science, 369, 1280-1281. https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.369.6509.1280

Wansink, B., & Pope, L. (2015) When do gain-framed health messages work better than fear appeals? Nutrition Reviews, 73, 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuu010

Yuan, J., Luo, Y., Yan, J.H., Meng, X., Yu, F., & Li, H. (2009) Neural correlates of the females’ susceptibility to negative emotions: An insight into gender-related prevalence of affective disturbances. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 3676-3896. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20796

Zabetakis, I., Lordan, R., Norton, C., & Tsoupras, A. (2020) COVID-19: the inflammation link and the role of nutrition in potential mitigation. Nutrients, 12, 1466. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12051466

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2024 Federico R. León, María I. Calixto, Agustín Espinosa, Carla Huapaya

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.